* feat: allow to spawn and run a local reusable workflow
This change contains the ability to parse/plan/run a local
reusable workflow.
There are still numerous things missing:
- inputs
- secrets
- outputs
* feat: add workflow_call inputs
* test: improve inputs test
* feat: add input defaults
* feat: allow expressions in inputs
* feat: use context specific expression evaluator
* refactor: prepare for better re-usability
* feat: add secrets for reusable workflows
* test: use secrets during test run
* feat: handle reusable workflow outputs
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat: interpolate the step names
Step names could contain expressions refering to event data.
Fixes#1353
* test: add missing mock data
* fix: setup composite expression evaluator
The RunContext does contain a cached ExpressionEvaluator.
This should be the case the composite RunContext as well.
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Casey Lee <cplee@nektos.com>
* feat: use logger from context wherever possible
Co-authored-by: Markus Wolf <markus.wolf@new-work.se>
* feat: add step/job id and results to json logs
Co-authored-by: Markus Wolf <markus.wolf@new-work.se>
* test: value to be masked should not be hard-coded in the action
Co-authored-by: Markus Wolf <markus.wolf@new-work.se>
* fix: replace values following ::add-mask:: in evaluated strings
Co-authored-by: Markus Wolf <markus.wolf@new-work.se>
* feat: [DEBUG] identifier for debug logs to distinguish them
Co-authored-by: Markus Wolf <markus.wolf@new-work.se>
* feat: replace logger with step logger
The container gets injected a job logger, but during the time that steps
are run, we want to use the step logger.
This commit wraps pre/main/post steps in an executor that replaces the
job logger with a step logger.
Co-authored-by: Markus Wolf <markus.wolf@new-work.se>
* feat: add pre/post stage identifier fields to json log output
Co-authored-by: Markus Wolf <markus.wolf@new-work.se>
* feat: add job/step result status to skipped steps/jobs
Co-authored-by: Markus Wolf <markus.wolf@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Markus Wolf <markus.wolf@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
To make the test logs more readable, we should fold the
output per test into a group.
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This prevented JetBrains GoLand from recognising subtests and treated
it all as single big test, VSCode seems to be still broken in that regard
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Casey Lee <cplee@nektos.com>
Prevents random failing of all other runs when qemu binfmt
is not set up
Signed-off-by: Ryan <me@hackerc.at>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* refactor: split step_context into separate files
This commit moves functions from the step_context.go file into different
files, but does otherwise not change anything.
This is done to make it easier to review the changes made to these
functions in the next commit, where we introduce a step factory to
facilitate better unit testing of steps.
Co-authored-by: Marcus Noll <marcus.noll@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Björn Brauer <bjoern.brauer@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Robert Kowalski <robert.kowalski@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Philipp Hinrichsen <philipp.hinrichsen@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Holland <jonas.holland@new-work.se>
* refactor: introduce step factory and make steps testable
With this commit we're introducing the `stepFactory` and interfaces
and implementations for each different kind of step (run, docker,
local and remote actions).
Separating each step kind into its own interface and implementation
makes it easier to reason about and to change behaviour of the step.
By introducing interfaces we enable better unit testability as now
each step implementation, the step factory and the job executor can
be tested on their own by mocking out parts that are irrelevant.
This commits prepares us for implementing pre/post actions in a
later PR.
Co-authored-by: Marcus Noll <marcus.noll@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Björn Brauer <bjoern.brauer@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Robert Kowalski <robert.kowalski@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Philipp Hinrichsen <philipp.hinrichsen@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Holland <jonas.holland@new-work.se>
* fix: run post steps in reverse order
* test: add missing asserts for mocks
* refactor: use local reference instead of function
This may make code more easy to follow.
* refactor: correct typo in function name
* test: use named structs
* test: only expected valid calls
There are mocks which are only called on certain conditions.
* refactor: use step-model to get step name
Using the step-logger we have to get the logger name from the
step model.
* test: only mock stopContainer if required
Co-authored-by: Björn Brauer <bjoern.brauer@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Marcus Noll <marcus.noll@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Robert Kowalski <robert.kowalski@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Philipp Hinrichsen <philipp.hinrichsen@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Holland <jonas.holland@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Casey Lee <cplee@nektos.com>
Co-authored-by: Christopher Homberger <christopher.homberger@web.de>
This splits the executor from the RunContext into its own function
called newJobExecutor.
We defined an interface called jobInfo which is implemented by the RunContext.
This enables better unit testing because only a small interface needs to
be mocked.
This is a preparation for implementing pre and post actions.
Co-authored-by: Björn Brauer <bjoern.brauer@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Marcus Noll <marcus.noll@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Holland <jonas.holland@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Robert Kowalski <robert.kowalski@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Markus Wolf <markus.wolf@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Björn Brauer <bjoern.brauer@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Marcus Noll <marcus.noll@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Holland <jonas.holland@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Robert Kowalski <robert.kowalski@new-work.se>
Co-authored-by: Markus Wolf <markus.wolf@new-work.se>
